wb-flow vs BMAD
| Dimension | wb-flow | BMAD |
|---|---|---|
| Execution (plan → parallel verified changes) | ✓ | partial |
| Planning (intent → executable task graph) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Artifact traceability (task → explain/execute/validate links) | ✓ | partial |
Architecture
BMAD optimizes for human, product, and architecture cognition with specialized roles. It excels at turning ambiguous business ideas into full products (PRD, UX, roles). wb-flow, by contrast, focuses on the engineering execution and traceability layer, giving you a control plane for parallel tasks and artifact graphs rather than a full product ideation framework.
Decision Framework
- Choose BMAD if: the job is turning an ambiguous business idea into a full product (PRD, UX, roles). BMAD is the strongest full product methodology.
- Choose wb-flow if: you have an existing codebase (e.g., a 500k-line repo) and need parallel execution with strong traceability and evidence for your engineering tasks.
